linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: nvidia: clean up indentation issues and comment block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <26ccc9eb-6edb-3ec6-5714-0bb470366b17@samsung.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:19:04 +0100
From:   Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Antonino Daplas <adaplas@...il.com>, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: nvidia: clean up indentation issues and
 comment block


On 1/13/20 3:46 PM, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> There is a hunk of code that is incorrectly indented, clean up the
> indentation and a comment block. Also remove block braces around a
> one line statement on an if condition and add missing spaces after
> if keywords.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

Patch queued for v5.6, thanks.

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

> ---
>  drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nvidia.c | 41 ++++++++++++++---------------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nvidia.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nvidia.c
> index c583c018304d..c24de9107958 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nvidia.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/nvidia/nvidia.c
> @@ -168,27 +168,26 @@ static int nvidia_panel_tweak(struct nvidia_par *par,
>  {
>  	int tweak = 0;
>  
> -   if (par->paneltweak) {
> -	   tweak = par->paneltweak;
> -   } else {
> -	   /* begin flat panel hacks */
> -	   /* This is unfortunate, but some chips need this register
> -	      tweaked or else you get artifacts where adjacent pixels are
> -	      swapped.  There are no hard rules for what to set here so all
> -	      we can do is experiment and apply hacks. */
> -
> -	   if(((par->Chipset & 0xffff) == 0x0328) && (state->bpp == 32)) {
> -		   /* At least one NV34 laptop needs this workaround. */
> -		   tweak = -1;
> -	   }
> -
> -	   if((par->Chipset & 0xfff0) == 0x0310) {
> -		   tweak = 1;
> -	   }
> -	   /* end flat panel hacks */
> -   }
> -
> -   return tweak;
> +	if (par->paneltweak) {
> +		tweak = par->paneltweak;
> +	} else {
> +		/* Begin flat panel hacks.
> +		 * This is unfortunate, but some chips need this register
> +		 * tweaked or else you get artifacts where adjacent pixels are
> +		 * swapped.  There are no hard rules for what to set here so all
> +		 * we can do is experiment and apply hacks.
> +		 */
> +		if (((par->Chipset & 0xffff) == 0x0328) && (state->bpp == 32)) {
> +			/* At least one NV34 laptop needs this workaround. */
> +			tweak = -1;
> +		}
> +
> +		if ((par->Chipset & 0xfff0) == 0x0310)
> +			tweak = 1;
> +		/* end flat panel hacks */
> +	}
> +
> +	return tweak;
>  }
>  
>  static void nvidia_screen_off(struct nvidia_par *par, int on)
>