lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_Jsq+9w2wjwoOfnnKUBk9kOkZFcU6aWwyaw05ye-p3_WDcaQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 11:18:17 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
Cc:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: mmc: remove identical phrase in
 disable-wp text

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:17 AM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On Sat, 4 Jan 2020 at 22:55, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 10:30:58 +0100, Johan Jonker wrote:
> > > There are two identical phrases in the disable-wp text,
> > > so remove one of them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc-controller.yaml | 3 +--
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > >
> >
> > Applied, thanks.
> >
> > Rob
>
> Rob,
>
> Normally I pick up the DT doc changes for mmc whenever you have acked
> them (at least more non-trivial changes). I regards to the
> mmc-controller.yaml file, I have no queued changes in my tree for this
> cycle so this should be fine in regards to conflicts.
>
> Going forward, do you prefer to pick the DT doc changes for mmc, or
> can I consider this as a single occasion thingy?

I usually only pick up small changes if they are a binding only series
and if they haven't been picked up already.

Though I've been picking up a few schema conversions primarily so I
can check that they validate. Hopefully that's temporary.

Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ