[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200116185235.GE24522@iweiny-DESK2.sc.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:52:36 -0800
From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
To: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
"Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
linux-ext4 <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-xfs <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2 01/12] fs/stat: Define DAX statx attribute
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 10:04:21AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 09:55:02AM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:39:35PM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:38:21PM -0800, Ira Weiny wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:10:50PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
> > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 11:45 AM Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:38:34AM -0800, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 12:37:15PM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > > > > > > On Fri 10-01-20 11:29:31, ira.weiny@...el.com wrote:
> > > > > > > > > From: Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> > > > > > > > >
> > > >
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> > > >
> > > > Sure, but for now I think referencing mmap for details on MAP_SYNC works.
> > > >
> > > > I suspect that we may have some word smithing once I get this series in and we
> > > > submit a change to the statx man page itself. Can I move forward with the
> > > > following for this patch?
> > > >
> > > > <quote>
> > > > STATX_ATTR_DAX
> > > >
> > > > The file is in the DAX (cpu direct access) state. DAX state
> > >
> > > Hmm, now that I see it written out, I <cough> kind of like "DAX mode"
> > > better now. :/
> > >
> > > "The file is in DAX (CPU direct access) mode. DAX mode attempts..."
> >
> > Sure... now you tell me... ;-)
> >
> > Seriously, we could use mode here in the man page as this is less confusing to
> > say "DAX mode".
> >
> > But I think the code should still use 'state' because mode is just too
> > overloaded. You were not the only one who was thrown by my use of mode and I
> > don't want that confusion when we look at this code 2 weeks from now...
> >
> > https://www.reddit.com/r/ProgrammerHumor/comments/852og2/only_god_knows/
> >
> > ;-)
>
> Ok, let's leave it alone for now then.
Cool could I get a reviewed by?
And Jan is this reword of the man page/commit ok to keep your reviewed by?
>
> I'm not even sure what 'DAX' stands for. Direct Access to ...
> Professor Xavier? 8-)
That is pronounced 'Direct A'Xes' you know, for chopping wood!
Thanks everyone,
Ira
>
> > >
> > > > attempts to minimize software cache effects for both I/O and
> > > > memory mappings of this file. It requires a file system which
> > > > has been configured to support DAX.
> > > >
> > > > DAX generally assumes all accesses are via cpu load / store
> > > > instructions which can minimize overhead for small accesses, but
> > > > may adversely affect cpu utilization for large transfers.
> > > >
> > > > File I/O is done directly to/from user-space buffers and memory
> > > > mapped I/O may be performed with direct memory mappings that
> > > > bypass kernel page cache.
> > > >
> > > > While the DAX property tends to result in data being transferred
> > > > synchronously, it does not give the same guarantees of
> > > > synchronous I/O where data and the necessary metadata are
> > > > transferred together.
> > >
> > > (I'm frankly not sure that synchronous I/O actually guarantees that the
> > > metadata has hit stable storage...)
> >
> > I'll let you and Dan work this one out... ;-)
>
> Hehe. I think the wording here is fine.
>
> --D
>
> > Ira
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists