[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200116165614.a3u5x7g4qxxrm6s4@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 17:56:14 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 053/205] pwm: sun4i: Fix incorrect
calculation of duty_cycle/period
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:40:28AM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> From: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 50cc7e3e4f26e3bf5ed74a8d061195c4d2161b8b ]
>
> Since 5.4-rc1, pwm_apply_state calls ->get_state after ->apply
> if available, and this revealed an issue with integer precision
> when calculating duty_cycle and period for the currently set
> state in ->get_state callback.
>
> This issue manifested in broken backlight on several Allwinner
> based devices.
>
> Previously this worked, because ->apply updated the passed state
> directly.
>
> Fixes: deb9c462f4e53 ("pwm: sun4i: Don't update the state for the caller of pwm_apply_state")
> Signed-off-by: Ondrej Jirman <megous@...ous.com>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Note that while the patch is still correct, the problem isn't that bad
any more since commit 01ccf903edd65f6421612321648fa5a7f4b7cb10 was
reverted.
So .get_state is only called once during boot where the breakage doesn't
hurt that much.
I let you decide if you still want to apply this patch.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists