[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877e1rfa40.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 20:57:03 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, nathanl@...ux.ibm.com,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Andrew Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list\:MIPS" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 10/11] lib: vdso: Allow arches to override the ns shift operation
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org> writes:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:58 AM Christophe Leroy
>
> Would mul_u64_u64_shr() be a good alternative? Could we adjust it to
> assume the shift is less than 32? That function exists to benefit
> 32-bit arches.
We'd want mul_u64_u32_shr() for this. The rules for mult and shift are:
1 <= mult <= U32_MAX
1 <= shift <= 32
If we want to enforce a shift < 32 we need to limit that conditionally
in the calculation/registration function.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists