linux-kernel - Re: [patch] mm, oom: dump stack of victim when reaping failed

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.21.2001161301570.101032@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 13:05:56 -0800 (PST)
From:   David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
cc:     Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [patch] mm, oom: dump stack of victim when reaping failed

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020, Tetsuo Handa wrote:

> > I'm 
> > currently tracking a stall in oom reaping where the victim doesn't always 
> > have a lock held so we don't know where it's at in the kernel; I'm hoping 
> > that a stack for the thread group leader will at least shed some light on 
> > it.
> > 
> 
> This change was already proposed at
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20180320122818.GL23100@dhcp22.suse.cz/ .
> 

Hmm, seems the patch didn't get followed up on but I obviously agree with 
it :)

> And according to that proposal, it is likely i_mmap_lock_write() in dup_mmap()
> in copy_process(). We tried to make that lock killable but we gave it up
> because nobody knows whether it is safe to do make it killable.
> 

I haven't encountered that particular problem yet; one problem that I've 
found is a victim holding cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem in the exit path, 
another problem is the victim not holding any locks at all which is more 
concerning (why isn't it making forward progress?).  This patch intends to 
provide a clue for the latter.

Aside: we may also want to consider the possibility of doing immediate 
additional oom killing if the initial victim is too small.  We rely on the 
oom reaper to solve livelocks like this by freeing memory so that 
allocators can drop locks that the victim depends on.  If the victim is 
too small (we have victims <1MB because of oom_score_adj +1000!) we may 
want to consider additional immediate oom killing because it simply won't 
free enough memory.