linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 078/203] bpf: Make use of probe_user

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200116231751.315347781@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:16:35 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 078/203] bpf: Make use of probe_user_write in probe write helper

From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>

commit eb1b66887472eaa7342305b7890ae510dd9d1a79 upstream.

Convert the bpf_probe_write_user() helper to probe_user_write() such that
writes are not attempted under KERNEL_DS anymore which is buggy as kernel
and user space pointers can have overlapping addresses. Also, given we have
the access_ok() check inside probe_user_write(), the helper doesn't need
to do it twice.

Fixes: 96ae52279594 ("bpf: Add bpf_probe_write_user BPF helper to be called in tracers")
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/841c461781874c07a0ee404a454c3bc0459eed30.1572649915.git.daniel@iogearbox.net
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c |    6 ++----
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_p
 	.arg3_type	= ARG_ANYTHING,
 };
 
-BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_write_user, void *, unsafe_ptr, const void *, src,
+BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_write_user, void __user *, unsafe_ptr, const void *, src,
 	   u32, size)
 {
 	/*
@@ -186,10 +186,8 @@ BPF_CALL_3(bpf_probe_write_user, void *,
 		return -EPERM;
 	if (unlikely(!nmi_uaccess_okay()))
 		return -EPERM;
-	if (!access_ok(unsafe_ptr, size))
-		return -EPERM;
 
-	return probe_kernel_write(unsafe_ptr, src, size);
+	return probe_user_write(unsafe_ptr, src, size);
 }
 
 static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_probe_write_user_proto = {