linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 192/203] rxrpc: Unlock new call in rxrpc_new_incoming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200116231801.009945367@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:18:29 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 192/203] rxrpc: Unlock new call in rxrpc_new_incoming_call() rather than the caller

From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>

[ Upstream commit f33121cbe91973a08e68e4bde8c3f7e6e4e351c1 ]

Move the unlock and the ping transmission for a new incoming call into
rxrpc_new_incoming_call() rather than doing it in the caller.  This makes
it clearer to see what's going on.

Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 net/rxrpc/call_accept.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 net/rxrpc/input.c       | 18 ------------------
 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
index 135bf5cd8dd5..3685b1732f65 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_accept.c
@@ -239,6 +239,22 @@ void rxrpc_discard_prealloc(struct rxrpc_sock *rx)
 	kfree(b);
 }
 
+/*
+ * Ping the other end to fill our RTT cache and to retrieve the rwind
+ * and MTU parameters.
+ */
+static void rxrpc_send_ping(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+	struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
+	ktime_t now = skb->tstamp;
+
+	if (call->peer->rtt_usage < 3 ||
+	    ktime_before(ktime_add_ms(call->peer->rtt_last_req, 1000), now))
+		rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_PING, sp->hdr.serial,
+				  true, true,
+				  rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_params);
+}
+
 /*
  * Allocate a new incoming call from the prealloc pool, along with a connection
  * and a peer as necessary.
@@ -346,9 +362,7 @@ struct rxrpc_call *rxrpc_new_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
 				  sp->hdr.seq, RX_INVALID_OPERATION, ESHUTDOWN);
 		skb->mark = RXRPC_SKB_MARK_REJECT_ABORT;
 		skb->priority = RX_INVALID_OPERATION;
-		_leave(" = NULL [close]");
-		call = NULL;
-		goto out;
+		goto no_call;
 	}
 
 	/* The peer, connection and call may all have sprung into existence due
@@ -361,9 +375,7 @@ struct rxrpc_call *rxrpc_new_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
 	call = rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call(rx, local, peer, conn, skb);
 	if (!call) {
 		skb->mark = RXRPC_SKB_MARK_REJECT_BUSY;
-		_leave(" = NULL [busy]");
-		call = NULL;
-		goto out;
+		goto no_call;
 	}
 
 	trace_rxrpc_receive(call, rxrpc_receive_incoming,
@@ -432,10 +444,18 @@ struct rxrpc_call *rxrpc_new_incoming_call(struct rxrpc_local *local,
 	 */
 	rxrpc_put_call(call, rxrpc_call_put);
 
-	_leave(" = %p{%d}", call, call->debug_id);
-out:
 	spin_unlock(&rx->incoming_lock);
+
+	rxrpc_send_ping(call, skb);
+	mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
+
+	_leave(" = %p{%d}", call, call->debug_id);
 	return call;
+
+no_call:
+	spin_unlock(&rx->incoming_lock);
+	_leave(" = NULL [%u]", skb->mark);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 /*
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/input.c b/net/rxrpc/input.c
index 157be1ff8697..86bd133b4fa0 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/input.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/input.c
@@ -192,22 +192,6 @@ send_extra_data:
 	goto out_no_clear_ca;
 }
 
-/*
- * Ping the other end to fill our RTT cache and to retrieve the rwind
- * and MTU parameters.
- */
-static void rxrpc_send_ping(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb)
-{
-	struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
-	ktime_t now = skb->tstamp;
-
-	if (call->peer->rtt_usage < 3 ||
-	    ktime_before(ktime_add_ms(call->peer->rtt_last_req, 1000), now))
-		rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_PING, sp->hdr.serial,
-				  true, true,
-				  rxrpc_propose_ack_ping_for_params);
-}
-
 /*
  * Apply a hard ACK by advancing the Tx window.
  */
@@ -1396,8 +1380,6 @@ int rxrpc_input_packet(struct sock *udp_sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
 		call = rxrpc_new_incoming_call(local, rx, skb);
 		if (!call)
 			goto reject_packet;
-		rxrpc_send_ping(call, skb);
-		mutex_unlock(&call->user_mutex);
 	}
 
 	/* Process a call packet; this either discards or passes on the ref
-- 
2.20.1