[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b7ef5047-c8c3-42cc-d049-fb72563d3544@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:19:22 +0000
From: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the usb-gadget tree
On 15/01/2020 20:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In commit
>
> 6a6ae4e8e926 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: Use atomic_t to track in-flight request")
>
> Fixes tag
>
> Fixes: 40d133d7f5426 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function interface
How should extra long fixes like this be divided up ?
Fixes: 40d133d7f542 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function
interface with backward compatibility")
Fixes: 40d133d7f542 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function
interface with backward compatibility")
?
I don't see that for fixes like these.
Fixes: commit e9061c397839 ("nvmet: Remove the data_len field from the
nvmet_req struct")
Fixes: 9e80635619b51 ("riscv: clear the instruction cache and all
registers when booting")
---
bod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists