linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the usb-gadget tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:19:22 +0000
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the usb-gadget tree

On 15/01/2020 20:07, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>    6a6ae4e8e926 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: Use atomic_t to track in-flight request")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>    Fixes: 40d133d7f5426 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function interface

How should extra long fixes like this be divided up ?

Fixes: 40d133d7f542 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function 
interface with backward compatibility")


Fixes: 40d133d7f542 ("usb: gadget: f_ncm: convert to new function
                       interface with backward compatibility")

?

I don't see that for fixes like these.

Fixes: commit e9061c397839 ("nvmet: Remove the data_len field from the 
nvmet_req struct")


Fixes: 9e80635619b51 ("riscv: clear the instruction cache and all 
registers when booting")

---
bod