linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] add the latest exfat driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7e5e56be-5b87-8f9c-60fa-134a13f8e762@web.de>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 10:36:36 +0100
From:   Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To:     Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Pali Rohár <pali.rohar@...il.com>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>,
        Valdis Klētnieks <valdis.kletnieks@...edu>,
        linkinjeon@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 00/14] add the latest exfat driver

> We plan to treat this version as the future upstream for the code base
> once merged, and all new features and bug fixes will go upstream first.
>
> v10:

I find it interesting how the patch change log grew.

>  - Process length value as 1 when conversion is failed.

Would this description be nicer without the word “is”?

I pointed also further software development concerns out.
I hope that they will get corresponding constructive feedback finally.
Other contributors are similarly waiting for “effects” according to
their code review comments.
How will communication delays evolve for the clarification of
remaining open issues?

Regards,
Markus