lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 09:44:11 +0000
From:   Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/amd: fix uninitalized structure cp

On 15/01/2020 12:42, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 07:25:07AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
>> It's probably complaining that cp.name[] isn't initialized.
> 
> That is possible.
> 
>> UBSan will probably generate a warning at runtime when we do:
>>
>> 	*ret = cp;
>>
>> But otherwise it's harmless.
> 
> Yes, because we don't do anything with cpio_data.name.
> 
Yep, apologies for the noise generated by this patch, please ignore it.

Colin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ