[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202001151727.C07DA17@keescook>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 17:29:32 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: PMWG CI <pmwg-ci@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Private Kernel Alias <private-kwg@...aro.org>,
Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: kunit stack usage, was: pmwg-ci report v5.5-rc4-147-gc62d43442481
On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 01:37:07PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 30, 2019 at 6:16 PM PMWG CI <pmwg-ci@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The error/warning: 1 drivers/base/test/property-entry-test.c:214:1: warning: the frame size of 3128 bytes is larger than 2048 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
> > ... was introduced by commit:
> >
> > commit c032ace71c29d513bf9df64ace1885fe5ff24981
> > Author: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
> > Date: Wed Dec 4 10:53:15 2019 -0800
> >
> > software node: add basic tests for property entries
>
> This problem is a result of the KUNIT_ASSERTION() definition that puts
> a local struct on the stack interacting badly with the structleak_plugin
> when CONFIG_GCC_PLUGIN_STRUCTLEAK_BYREF_ALL is set in
> allmodconfig:
Geh, BYREF_ALL strikes again. I'm at LCA currently, but I'd like to try
to revisit actually fixing the basic-block splitting in the plugin. This
was looked at before, but I need to dig up the thread.
If a fast fix is needed, I'm fine with disabling BYREF_ALL with KUNIT.
It's not optimal, but I feel it's on the BYREF_ALL code to solve this. :)
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists