[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87eevzwsv9.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:19:54 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rcu@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kernel: set taint flag 'L' at any kind of lockup
Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...dex-team.ru> writes:
> Any lockup or stall notifies about unexpected lack of progress.
> It's better to know about them for further problem investigations.
>
> Right now only softlockup has own taint flag. Let's generalize it.
>
> This patch renames TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP into TAINT_LOCKUP at sets it for:
Please search 'This patch' in Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst
> - softlockup
> - hardlockup
> - RCU stalls
> - stuck in workqueues
> - detected task hung
This does too many things at once and wants to be split in pieces:
1) Change the TAINT flag and update documentation
2) Add the tainting to the places which are not yet covered
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists