[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <878sm7wr7e.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:55:49 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, keescook@...omium.org,
longman@...hat.com, mingo@...nel.org, mm-commits@...r.kernel.org,
rppt@...ux.ibm.com, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: + watchdog-fix-possible-soft-lockup-warning-at-bootup-v2.patch added to -mm tree
akpm@...ux-foundation.org writes:
> ------------------------------------------------------
> From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Subject: watchdog: Fix possible soft lockup warning at bootup
Completely empty changelog without any justification for this change.
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200103151032.19590-1-longman@redhat.com
> Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> kernel/watchdog.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/kernel/watchdog.c~watchdog-fix-possible-soft-lockup-warning-at-bootup-v2
> +++ a/kernel/watchdog.c
> @@ -496,9 +496,7 @@ static void watchdog_enable(unsigned int
> HRTIMER_MODE_REL_PINNED_HARD);
>
> /* Initialize timestamp */
> - if (system_state != SYSTEM_BOOTING)
> - __touch_watchdog();
> -
> + __touch_watchdog();
> /* Enable the perf event */
> if (watchdog_enabled & NMI_WATCHDOG_ENABLED)
> watchdog_nmi_enable(cpu);
> _
>
> Patches currently in -mm which might be from longman@...hat.com are
>
> watchdog-fix-possible-soft-lockup-warning-at-bootup.patch
> watchdog-fix-possible-soft-lockup-warning-at-bootup-v2.patch
Please drop both. The initial one just papers over timer interrupt loss
and weakens debugging. That V2 thing is just fixing up the wreckage
introduced in the initial one.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists