linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the usb-gadget tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6b984328-b3f4-a23d-efb3-7e7955ad165a@linaro.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:45:25 +0000
From:   Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Fixes tag needs some work in the usb-gadget tree

On 16/01/2020 01:41, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Bryan,
> 
> On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 01:19:22 +0000 Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@...aro.org> wrote:
>>
>> How should extra long fixes like this be divided up ?
> 
> Just let them run on even if they are too long i.e. don't split them at all.

That's what's in the git commit log though isn't it ?