| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <A2975661238FB949B60364EF0F2C25743A183E28@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 12:19:09 +0000
From: "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
CC: "kwankhede@...dia.com" <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
"joro@...tes.org" <joro@...tes.org>,
"peterx@...hat.com" <peterx@...hat.com>,
"baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 01/12] vfio_pci: refine user config reference in
vfio-pci module
> From: Alex Williamson [mailto:alex.williamson@...hat.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 10, 2020 6:48 AM
> To: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/12] vfio_pci: refine user config reference in vfio-pci
> module
>
> On Tue, 7 Jan 2020 20:01:38 +0800
> Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > This patch adds three fields in struct vfio_pci_device to pass the user
> > configurations of vfio-pci.ko module to some functions which could be
> > common in future usage. The values stored in struct vfio_pci_device will
> > be initiated in probe and refreshed in device open phase to allow runtime
> > modifications to parameters. e.g. disable_idle_d3 and nointxmask.
> >
> > Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>
> > Cc: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h | 8 ++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > index 379a02c..af507c2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci.c
> > @@ -54,10 +54,10 @@ module_param(disable_idle_d3, bool, S_IRUGO |
> S_IWUSR);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(disable_idle_d3,
> > "Disable using the PCI D3 low power state for idle, unused devices");
> >
> > -static inline bool vfio_vga_disabled(void)
> > +static inline bool vfio_vga_disabled(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> > {
> > #ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_VGA
> > - return disable_vga;
> > + return vdev->disable_vga;
> > #else
> > return true;
> > #endif
> > @@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ static unsigned int vfio_pci_set_vga_decode(void *opaque,
> bool single_vga)
> > unsigned char max_busnr;
> > unsigned int decodes;
> >
> > - if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled() || pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
> > + if (single_vga || !vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) ||
> > + pci_is_root_bus(pdev->bus))
> > return VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_IO | VGA_RSRC_NORMAL_MEM |
> > VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_IO | VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MEM;
> >
> > @@ -289,7 +290,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> > if (!vdev->pci_saved_state)
> > pci_dbg(pdev, "%s: Couldn't store saved state\n", __func__);
> >
> > - if (likely(!nointxmask)) {
> > + if (likely(!vdev->nointxmask)) {
> > if (vfio_pci_nointx(pdev)) {
> > pci_info(pdev, "Masking broken INTx support\n");
> > vdev->nointx = true;
> > @@ -326,7 +327,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_enable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> > } else
> > vdev->msix_bar = 0xFF;
> >
> > - if (!vfio_vga_disabled() && vfio_pci_is_vga(pdev))
> > + if (!vfio_vga_disabled(vdev) && vfio_pci_is_vga(pdev))
> > vdev->has_vga = true;
> >
> >
> > @@ -462,10 +463,17 @@ static void vfio_pci_disable(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev)
> >
> > vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(vdev);
> >
> > - if (!disable_idle_d3)
> > + if (!vdev->disable_idle_d3)
> > vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D3hot);
> > }
> >
> > +void vfio_pci_refresh_config(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> > + bool nointxmask, bool disable_idle_d3)
> > +{
> > + vdev->nointxmask = nointxmask;
> > + vdev->disable_idle_d3 = disable_idle_d3;
>
> These two are selected (not disable_vga) because they're the only
> writable module options, correct?
yep. These were selected per previous review comments from
you. I also checked in the code, the existing 4 module options
are clarified as below, and I can see only nointxmask and disable_idle_d3
are writable. I guess this should be the evidence for selecting the
modules options to be refreshed in vfio_pci_refresh_config().
static char ids[1024] __initdata;
module_param_string(ids, ids, sizeof(ids), 0);
static bool nointxmask;
module_param_named(nointxmask, nointxmask, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
static bool disable_vga;
module_param(disable_vga, bool, S_IRUGO);
static bool disable_idle_d3;
module_param(disable_idle_d3, bool, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
>
> > +}
> > +
> > static void vfio_pci_release(void *device_data)
> > {
> > struct vfio_pci_device *vdev = device_data;
> > @@ -490,6 +498,8 @@ static int vfio_pci_open(void *device_data)
> > if (!try_module_get(THIS_MODULE))
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > + vfio_pci_refresh_config(vdev, nointxmask, disable_idle_d3);
> > +
> > mutex_lock(&vdev->reflck->lock);
> >
> > if (!vdev->refcnt) {
> > @@ -1330,6 +1340,11 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
> struct pci_device_id *id)
> > spin_lock_init(&vdev->irqlock);
> > mutex_init(&vdev->ioeventfds_lock);
> > INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vdev->ioeventfds_list);
> > + vdev->nointxmask = nointxmask;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_VGA
> > + vdev->disable_vga = disable_vga;
> > +#endif
> > + vdev->disable_idle_d3 = disable_idle_d3;
>
> But this could still use vfio_pci_refresh_config() for those writable
> options and set disable_vga separately, couldn't it?
Right, would modify it. thanks.
> Also, since
> disable_idle_d3 is related to power handling of the device while it is
> not opened by the user, shouldn't the config also be refreshed when the
> device is released by the user?
Oh, yes. You told me to do it. But I assumed that we only care
about the config used during an open() and a release() circle.
I missed it will affect the power management. Let me add the
config refresh at release() all the same. Thanks.
>
> >
> > ret = vfio_add_group_dev(&pdev->dev, &vfio_pci_ops, vdev);
> > if (ret) {
> > @@ -1354,7 +1369,7 @@ static int vfio_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev, const
> struct pci_device_id *id)
> >
> > vfio_pci_probe_power_state(vdev);
> >
> > - if (!disable_idle_d3) {
> > + if (!vdev->disable_idle_d3) {
> > /*
> > * pci-core sets the device power state to an unknown value at
> > * bootup and after being removed from a driver. The only
> > @@ -1385,7 +1400,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > kfree(vdev->region);
> > mutex_destroy(&vdev->ioeventfds_lock);
> >
> > - if (!disable_idle_d3)
> > + if (!vdev->disable_idle_d3)
> > vfio_pci_set_power_state(vdev, PCI_D0);
> >
> > kfree(vdev->pm_save);
> > @@ -1620,7 +1635,7 @@ static void vfio_pci_try_bus_reset(struct vfio_pci_device
> *vdev)
> > if (!ret) {
> > tmp->needs_reset = false;
> >
> > - if (tmp != vdev && !disable_idle_d3)
> > + if (tmp != vdev && !tmp->disable_idle_d3)
> > vfio_pci_set_power_state(tmp, PCI_D3hot);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -1636,7 +1651,7 @@ static void __exit vfio_pci_cleanup(void)
> > vfio_pci_uninit_perm_bits();
> > }
> >
> > -static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(void)
> > +static void __init vfio_pci_fill_ids(char *ids)
>
> This might be more clear if the global was also renamed vfio_pci_ids.
Yep. Let me rename it later.
> > {
> > char *p, *id;
> > int rc;
> > @@ -1691,7 +1706,7 @@ static int __init vfio_pci_init(void)
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_driver;
> >
> > - vfio_pci_fill_ids();
> > + vfio_pci_fill_ids(ids);
> >
> > return 0;
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> > index 8a2c760..0398608 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> > +++ b/drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_private.h
> > @@ -122,6 +122,11 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
> > struct list_head dummy_resources_list;
> > struct mutex ioeventfds_lock;
> > struct list_head ioeventfds_list;
> > + bool nointxmask;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_VFIO_PCI_VGA
> > + bool disable_vga;
> > +#endif
> > + bool disable_idle_d3;
>
> It seems like there are more relevant places these could be within this
> structure, ex. nointxmask next to nointx, disable_vga near has_vga,
> disable_idle_d3 maybe near needs_pm_restore (even though those aren't
> conceptually related). Not necessarily related to this series, it
> might be time to convert the existing bools to bit fields, but even
> before that the alignment of adding these as bools grouped with the
> existing bools is probably better. Thanks,
Agreed. Will place the new bools at better place (with proper neighbors:-))
> Alex
Thanks,
Yi Liu
>
> > };
> >
> > #define is_intx(vdev) (vdev->irq_type == VFIO_PCI_INTX_IRQ_INDEX)
> > @@ -130,6 +135,9 @@ struct vfio_pci_device {
> > #define is_irq_none(vdev) (!(is_intx(vdev) || is_msi(vdev) || is_msix(vdev)))
> > #define irq_is(vdev, type) (vdev->irq_type == type)
> >
> > +extern void vfio_pci_refresh_config(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev,
> > + bool nointxmask, bool disable_idle_d3);
> > +
> > extern void vfio_pci_intx_mask(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev);
> > extern void vfio_pci_intx_unmask(struct vfio_pci_device *vdev);
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists