[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1579181217-31127-2-git-send-email-srinivas.neeli@xilinx.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:56:49 +0530
From: Srinivas Neeli <srinivas.neeli@...inx.com>
To: linux@...ck-us.net, michal.simek@...inx.com,
shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com, sgoud@...inx.com
Cc: wim@...ux-watchdog.org, linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
git@...inx.com
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] watchdog: of_xilinx_wdt: Add comment to spinlock
From: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
Based on checkpatch every spinlock should be documented.
The patch is fixing this issue:
./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict -f drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
CHECK: spinlock_t definition without comment
+ spinlock_t spinlock;
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Goud <srinivas.goud@...inx.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>
---
drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
index 7fe4f7c3f7ce..00549164b3d7 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/of_xilinx_wdt.c
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
struct xwdt_device {
void __iomem *base;
u32 wdt_interval;
- spinlock_t spinlock;
+ spinlock_t spinlock; /* spinlock for register handling */
struct watchdog_device xilinx_wdt_wdd;
struct clk *clk;
};
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists