linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in bpf_map_batch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:33:18 +0100
From:   Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To:     Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>,
        Brian Vazquez <brianvv.kernel@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        bpf@...r.kernel.org, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] libbpf: Fix unneeded extra initialization in
 bpf_map_batch_common

On 1/16/20 5:59 AM, Brian Vazquez wrote:
> bpf_attr doesn't required to be declared with '= {}' as memset is used
> in the code.
> 
> Fixes: 2ab3d86ea1859 ("libbpf: Add libbpf support to batch ops")
> Reported-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Brian Vazquez <brianvv@...gle.com>

Applied, thanks!