[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200116153145.2392-1-pmladek@suse.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 16:31:41 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>
Cc: Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
Kamalesh Babulal <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicolai Stange <nstange@...e.de>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/4] livepatch/samples/selftest: Clean up show variables handling
Dan Carpenter reported suspicious allocations of shadow variables
in the sample module, see
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200107132929.ficffmrm5ntpzcqa@kili.mountain
The code did not cause a real problem. But it was indeed misleading
and semantically wrong. I got confused several times when cleaning it.
So I decided to split the change into few steps. I hope that
it will help reviewers and future readers.
The changes of the sample module are basically the same as in the RFC.
In addition, there is a clean up of the module used by the selftest.
Petr Mladek (4):
livepatch/sample: Use the right type for the leaking data pointer
livepatch/selftest: Clean up shadow variable names and type
livepatch/samples/selftest: Use klp_shadow_alloc() API correctly
livepatch: Handle allocation failure in the sample of shadow variable
API
lib/livepatch/test_klp_shadow_vars.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++-------------
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix1.c | 39 ++++++----
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-fix2.c | 4 +-
samples/livepatch/livepatch-shadow-mod.c | 4 +-
4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
--
2.16.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists