linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate.c: also overwrite error when it is bigger than zero

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200117234829.GA2844@richard>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jan 2020 07:48:29 +0800
From:   Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/migrate.c: also overwrite error when it is bigger
 than zero

On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:30:18PM -0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 2:27 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 03:45:34PM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> >If we get here after successfully adding page to list, err would be
>> >the number of pages in the list.
>> >
>> >Current code has two problems:
>> >
>> >  * on success, 0 is not returned
>> >  * on error, the real error code is not returned
>> >
>>
>> Well, this breaks the user interface. User would receive 1 even the migration
>> succeed.
>>
>> The change is introduced by e0153fc2c760 ("mm: move_pages: return valid node
>> id in status if the page is already on the target node").
>
>Yes, it may return a value which is > 0. But, it seems do_pages_move()
>could return > 0 value even before this commit.
>
>For example, if I read the code correctly, it would do:
>
>If we already have some pages on the queue then
>add_page_for_migration() return error, then do_move_pages_to_node() is
>called, but it may return > 0 value (the number of pages that were
>*not* migrated by migrate_pages()), then the code flow would just jump
>to "out" and return the value. And, it may happen to be 1.
>

This is another point I think current code is not working well. And actually,
the behavior is not well defined or our kernel is broken for a while.

When you look at the man page, it says:

    RETURN VALUE
           On success move_pages() returns zero.  On error, it returns -1, and sets errno to indicate the error

So per my understanding, the design is to return -1 on error instead of the
pages not managed to move.

For the user interface, if original code check 0 for success, your change
breaks it. Because your code would return 1 instead of 0. Suppose most user
just read the man page for programming instead of reading the kernel source
code. I believe we need to fix it.

Not sure how to include some user interface related developer to look into
this issue. Hope this thread may catch their eyes.

>I'm not sure if it breaks the user interface since the behavior has
>been existed for years, and it looks nobody complains about it. Maybe
>glibc helps hide it or people just care if it is 0 and the status.
>
>>
>> >Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>> >---
>> > mm/migrate.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> >diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>> >index 557da996b936..c3ef70de5876 100644
>> >--- a/mm/migrate.c
>> >+++ b/mm/migrate.c
>> >@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
>> >       err1 = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>> >       if (!err1)
>> >               err1 = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
>> >-      if (!err)
>> >+      if (err >= 0)
>> >               err = err1;
>> > out:
>> >       return err;
>> >--
>> >2.17.1
>>
>> --
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me
>>

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me