[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afc473b1-6857-4cca-101d-2382f5314f0d@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:53:18 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>, alim.akhtar@...sung.com,
avri.altman@....com, asutoshd@...eaurora.org, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, stanley.chu@...iatek.com,
beanhuo@...ron.com, tomas.winkler@...el.com, cang@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/9] scsi: ufs: Delete struct ufs_dev_desc
On 2020-01-16 13:59, Bean Huo wrote:
> struct ufs_dev_fix {
> - struct ufs_dev_desc card;
> + u16 wmanufacturerid;
> + u8 *model;
> unsigned int quirk;
> };
>
> -#define END_FIX { { 0 }, 0 }
> +#define END_FIX { 0 }
A minor comment: please use { } instead of { 0 }.
> /* add specific device quirk */
> #define UFS_FIX(_vendor, _model, _quirk) { \
> - .card.wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> - .card.model = (_model), \
> + .wmanufacturerid = (_vendor),\
> + .model = (_model), \
> .quirk = (_quirk), \
> }
Is this macro useful? Does it improve readability of the code? If not,
how about removing it (maybe later)?
Anyway:
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists