linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <cca98d8c-4308-9fe8-5192-863851702369@kernel.dk>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jan 2020 21:51:54 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Jaedon Shin <jaedon.shin@...il.com>,
        "open list:LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)" 
        <linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] ata: ahci_brcm: Follow-up changes for BCM7216

On 1/16/20 9:44 PM, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> 
> 
> On 1/8/2020 1:25 AM, Philipp Zabel wrote:
>> Hi Florian,
>>
>> On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 10:30 -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> Hi Jens, Philipp,
>>>
>>> These three patches are a follow-up to my previous series titled: ata:
>>> ahci_brcm: Fixes and new device support.
>>>
>>> After submitting the BCM7216 RESCAL reset driver, Philipp the reset
>>> controller maintained indicated that the reset line should be self
>>> de-asserting and so reset_control_reset() should be used instead.
>>>
>>> These three patches update the driver in that regard. It would be great if
>>> you could apply those and get them queued up for 5.6 since they are
>>> directly related to the previous series.
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> - introduced a preliminary patch making use of the proper reset control
>>>   API in order to manage the optional reset controller line
>>> - updated patches after introducing that preliminary patch
>>
>> The third patch could be simplified by storing the rescal reset control
>> in a separate struct member and relying on the optional reset control
>> API more. This is just a suggestion though, the series looks fine as-is.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> 
> Thanks! Jens is that good for you?

Can you re-send against the current branch and include the reviewed-bys
from here as well?


-- 
Jens Axboe