linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200117085851.GS3191@gate.crashing.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:58:51 -0600
From:   Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>
To:     Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@....fr>
Cc:     Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>, nathanl@...ux.ibm.com,
        arnd@...db.de, tglx@...utronix.de, vincenzo.frascino@....com,
        luto@...nel.org, x86@...nel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-mips@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 00/11] powerpc: switch VDSO to C implementation.

Hi!

On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 05:58:24PM +0000, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> On a powerpc8xx, with current powerpc/32 ASM VDSO:
> 
> gettimeofday:    vdso: 907 nsec/call
> clock-getres-realtime:    vdso: 484 nsec/call
> clock-gettime-realtime:    vdso: 899 nsec/call
> 
> The first patch adds VDSO generic C support without any changes to common code.
> Performance is as follows:
> 
> gettimeofday:    vdso: 1211 nsec/call
> clock-getres-realtime:    vdso: 722 nsec/call
> clock-gettime-realtime:    vdso: 1216 nsec/call
> 
> Then a few changes in the common code have allowed performance improvement. At
> the end of the series we have:
> 
> gettimeofday:    vdso: 974 nsec/call
> clock-getres-realtime:    vdso: 545 nsec/call
> clock-gettime-realtime:    vdso: 941 nsec/call
> 
> The final result is rather close to pure ASM VDSO:
> * 7% more on gettimeofday (9 cycles)
> * 5% more on clock-gettime-realtime (6 cycles)
> * 12% more on clock-getres-realtime (8 cycles)

Nice!  Much better.

It should be tested on more representative hardware, too, but this looks
promising alright :-)


Segher