[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1579261009-4573-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:36:46 +0200
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
To: <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>, <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
<ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com>
CC: <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] clk: at91: usb: continue if clk_hw_round_rate() return zero
clk_hw_round_rate() may call round rate function of its parents. In case
of SAM9X60 two of USB parrents are PLLA and UPLL. These clocks are
controlled by clk-sam9x60-pll.c driver. The round rate function for this
driver is sam9x60_pll_round_rate() which call in turn
sam9x60_pll_get_best_div_mul(). In case the requested rate is not in the
proper range (rate < characteristics->output[0].min &&
rate > characteristics->output[0].max) the sam9x60_pll_round_rate() will
return a negative number to its caller (called by
clk_core_round_rate_nolock()). clk_hw_round_rate() will return zero in
case a negative number is returned by clk_core_round_rate_nolock(). With
this, the USB clock will continue its rate computation even caller of
clk_hw_round_rate() returned an error. With this, the USB clock on SAM9X60
may not chose the best parent. I detected this after a suspend/resume
cycle on SAM9X60.
Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
---
drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
index 22aede42a336..3c0bd7e51b09 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/at91/clk-usb.c
@@ -75,6 +75,9 @@ static int at91sam9x5_clk_usb_determine_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
tmp_parent_rate = req->rate * div;
tmp_parent_rate = clk_hw_round_rate(parent,
tmp_parent_rate);
+ if (!tmp_parent_rate)
+ continue;
+
tmp_rate = DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(tmp_parent_rate, div);
if (tmp_rate < req->rate)
tmp_diff = req->rate - tmp_rate;
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists