[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117130543.GA9093@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:05:44 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, nd@....com,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Return EINVAL when precise_ip perf events are
requested on Arm
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:58:55AM +0000, James Clark wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > index df352b334ea7..4ddbdb93b3b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c
> > @@ -102,6 +102,9 @@ armpmu_map_event(struct perf_event *event,
> > u64 config = event->attr.config;
> > int type = event->attr.type;
> >
> > + if (event->attr.precise)
> > + return -EINVAL;
Also, does this field even exist? Guessing you mean 'precise_ip', but
then that means this hasn't even seen a compiler :(
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists