[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN7PR08MB5684EBF75EF47DD5FF7F4638DB310@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:32:41 +0000
From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
"alim.akhtar@...sung.com" <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
"avri.altman@....com" <avri.altman@....com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"tomas.winkler@...el.com" <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v2 5/9] scsi: ufs: Delete two unnecessary
functions
Hi, Bart
> > From: Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
> >
> > Delete ufshcd_read_power_desc() and ufshcd_read_device_desc(),
> > directly inline ufshcd_read_desc() into its callers.
>
> How about changing the subject into "Inline two functions into their callers"?
> Otherwise this patch looks fine to me.
>
I said you are expert on English, it will be changed in the next version.
Thanks,
//Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists