linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 1/3] drivers: target: target_core_device: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200117133854.32550-1-frextrite@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 19:08:53 +0530
From:   Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
To:     "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Cc:     linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
        Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
        Madhuparna Bhowmik <madhuparnabhowmik04@...il.com>,
        "Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 1/3] drivers: target: target_core_device: Pass lockdep expression to RCU lists

nacl->lun_entry_hlist is traversed with hlist_for_each_entry_rcu
outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the
protection of nacl->lun_entry_mutex.

Hence, add the corresponding lockdep expression to the list traversal
primitive to silence false-positive lockdep warnings, and
harden RCU lists.

Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <frextrite@...il.com>
---
v3:
- Remove rcu_read_lock_held() from lockdep expression since it is
  implicitly checked for.
- Remove unintended macro usage.

v2:
- Fix sparse error
  CHECK: Alignment should match open parenthesis

 drivers/target/target_core_device.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
index 2d19f0e332b0..306c626183d5 100644
--- a/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
+++ b/drivers/target/target_core_device.c
@@ -247,7 +247,8 @@ void core_free_device_list_for_node(
 	struct se_dev_entry *deve;
 
 	mutex_lock(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex);
-	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link) {
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link,
+				 lockdep_is_held(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex)) {
 		struct se_lun *lun = rcu_dereference_check(deve->se_lun,
 					lockdep_is_held(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex));
 		core_disable_device_list_for_node(lun, deve, nacl, tpg);
@@ -276,7 +277,8 @@ struct se_dev_entry *target_nacl_find_deve(struct se_node_acl *nacl, u64 mapped_
 {
 	struct se_dev_entry *deve;
 
-	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link)
+	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link,
+				 lockdep_is_held(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex))
 		if (deve->mapped_lun == mapped_lun)
 			return deve;
 
@@ -460,7 +462,8 @@ void core_clear_lun_from_tpg(struct se_lun *lun, struct se_portal_group *tpg)
 	list_for_each_entry(nacl, &tpg->acl_node_list, acl_list) {
 
 		mutex_lock(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex);
-		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link) {
+		hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(deve, &nacl->lun_entry_hlist, link,
+					 lockdep_is_held(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex)) {
 			struct se_lun *tmp_lun = rcu_dereference_check(deve->se_lun,
 					lockdep_is_held(&nacl->lun_entry_mutex));
 
-- 
2.24.1