[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117134501.GA19008@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 13:45:01 +0000
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Ionela Voinescu <ionela.voinescu@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
viresh kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@...il.com>,
Javi Merino <javi.merino@...nel.org>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...durent.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch v8 4/7] sched/fair: Enable periodic update of average
thermal pressure
On Friday 17 Jan 2020 at 14:17:36 (+0100), Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 13:31, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> > Sure, but we should still track the thermals unconditionally, even if
> > only CFS consumes it.
>
> I agree, tracking thermal pressure should happen even if no cfs task are running
Bah, I got confused with cpu_capacity update stuff. This is for the PELT
signal, so +1 this should be updated unconditionally.
Thanks,
Quentin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists