linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: Remove dma_device_satisfies

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200117152933.31175-2-geert+renesas@glider.be>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 16:29:31 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
To:     Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc:     Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
        Matt Porter <mporter@...sulko.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] dmaengine: Remove dma_device_satisfies_mask() wrapper

Commit aa1e6f1a385eb2b0 ("dmaengine: kill struct dma_client and
supporting infrastructure") removed the last user of the
dma_device_satisfies_mask() wrapper.

Remove the wrapper, and rename __dma_device_satisfies_mask() to
dma_device_satisfies_mask(), to get rid of one more function starting
with a double underscore.

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
---
 drivers/dma/dmaengine.c | 9 +++------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
index 4ac77456e8300828..56a8420c388679d3 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/dmaengine.c
@@ -308,11 +308,8 @@ static void dma_channel_rebalance(void)
 		}
 }
 
-#define dma_device_satisfies_mask(device, mask) \
-	__dma_device_satisfies_mask((device), &(mask))
-static int
-__dma_device_satisfies_mask(struct dma_device *device,
-			    const dma_cap_mask_t *want)
+static int dma_device_satisfies_mask(struct dma_device *device,
+				     const dma_cap_mask_t *want)
 {
 	dma_cap_mask_t has;
 
@@ -531,7 +528,7 @@ static struct dma_chan *private_candidate(const dma_cap_mask_t *mask,
 {
 	struct dma_chan *chan;
 
-	if (mask && !__dma_device_satisfies_mask(dev, mask)) {
+	if (mask && !dma_device_satisfies_mask(dev, mask)) {
 		dev_dbg(dev->dev, "%s: wrong capabilities\n", __func__);
 		return NULL;
 	}
-- 
2.17.1