[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117162409.GL3929@twin.jikos.cz>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:24:09 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the btrfs tree
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:30:04AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
> 
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c: In function 'exclude_super_stripes':
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1706:5: warning: 'logical' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  1706 |     kfree(logical);
>       |     ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1691:20: warning: 'stripe_len' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>  1691 |    if (logical[nr] + stripe_len <= cache->start)
>       |        ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> Introduced by commit
> 
>   767f58cdaf20 ("btrfs: Refactor btrfs_rmap_block to improve readability")
> 
> btrfs_rmap_block() returns zero even if its output arguments are not
> assigned to ... maybe the final "return 0" should be "return ret"?
Yes that's it, thanks. Updated for-next branch pushed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists