[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200117162409.GL3929@twin.jikos.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:24:09 +0100
From: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nikolay Borisov <nborisov@...e.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the btrfs tree
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:30:04AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the btrfs tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) produced these warnings:
>
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c: In function 'exclude_super_stripes':
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1706:5: warning: 'logical' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 1706 | kfree(logical);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> fs/btrfs/block-group.c:1691:20: warning: 'stripe_len' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
> 1691 | if (logical[nr] + stripe_len <= cache->start)
> | ~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> Introduced by commit
>
> 767f58cdaf20 ("btrfs: Refactor btrfs_rmap_block to improve readability")
>
> btrfs_rmap_block() returns zero even if its output arguments are not
> assigned to ... maybe the final "return 0" should be "return ret"?
Yes that's it, thanks. Updated for-next branch pushed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists