[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5abf5440-7c1c-b9e9-9770-b89759771a44@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:27:47 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...nel.org, sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com,
pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next v5] mm/hotplug: silence a lockdep splat with
printk()
> diff --git a/include/linux/page-isolation.h b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> index 148e65a9c606..da043ae86488 100644
> --- a/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> +++ b/include/linux/page-isolation.h
> @@ -33,8 +33,8 @@ static inline bool is_migrate_isolate(int migratetype)
> #define MEMORY_OFFLINE 0x1
> #define REPORT_FAILURE 0x2
>
> -bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int migratetype,
> - int flags);
> +struct page *has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zone, struct page *page, int
> + migratetype, int flags);
the "int" should go onto the next line as well
[...]
apart from that looks good to me. I hope we won't have a whac-a-mole
with printk() (including WARN_ON() etc?) under the zone lock. This all
screams for a better fix.
As this patch is now fairly small and seems to do the trick for now
Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists