linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87muam0zxj.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 18:12:56 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        "open list\:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] selftests/x86: Build with LDFLAGS and LDLIBS

Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org> writes:

> During cross-compilation, it was discovered that LDFLAGS and
> LDLIBS were not being used while building binaries, leading
> to defaults which were not necessarily correct.
>
> OpenEmbedded reported this kind of problem:
>   ERROR: QA Issue: No GNU_HASH in the ELF binary [...], didn't pass LDFLAGS?
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Díaz <daniel.diaz@...aro.org>

Acked-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>