lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200117174128.359879963@goodmis.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:41:18 -0500
From:   Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
        Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
        Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
        Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 07/32] x86: preempt: Check preemption level before looking at lazy-preempt

4.19.94-rt39-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>

[ Upstream commit 19fc8557f2323c52b26561651ed4d51fc688a740 ]

Before evaluating the lazy-preempt state it must be ensure that the
preempt-count is zero.

Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
index f66708779274..afa0e42ccdd1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ static __always_inline bool __preempt_count_dec_and_test(void)
 	if (____preempt_count_dec_and_test())
 		return true;
 #ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_LAZY
+	if (preempt_count())
+		return false;
 	if (current_thread_info()->preempt_lazy_count)
 		return false;
 	return test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY);
-- 
2.24.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ