[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200117174127.925738696@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 12:41:15 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Julia Cartwright <julia@...com>,
Daniel Wagner <wagi@...om.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@...nel.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH RT 04/32] thermal/x86_pkg_temp: make pkg_temp_lock a raw spinlock
4.19.94-rt39-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
[ Upstream commit 8b03bb3ea7861b70b506199a69b1c8f81fe2d4d0 ]
The spinlock pkg_temp_lock has the potential of being taken in atomic
context on v5.2-rt PREEMPT_RT. It's static and limited scope so
go ahead and make it a raw spinlock.
Signed-off-by: Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@...dmis.org>
---
drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
index 1ef937d799e4..540becb78a0f 100644
--- a/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
+++ b/drivers/thermal/x86_pkg_temp_thermal.c
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ static int max_packages __read_mostly;
/* Array of package pointers */
static struct pkg_device **packages;
/* Serializes interrupt notification, work and hotplug */
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pkg_temp_lock);
+static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pkg_temp_lock);
/* Protects zone operation in the work function against hotplug removal */
static DEFINE_MUTEX(thermal_zone_mutex);
@@ -291,12 +291,12 @@ static void pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
u64 msr_val, wr_val;
mutex_lock(&thermal_zone_mutex);
- spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
++pkg_work_cnt;
pkgdev = pkg_temp_thermal_get_dev(cpu);
if (!pkgdev) {
- spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
mutex_unlock(&thermal_zone_mutex);
return;
}
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static void pkg_temp_thermal_threshold_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
}
enable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
- spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
/*
* If tzone is not NULL, then thermal_zone_mutex will prevent the
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static int pkg_thermal_notify(u64 msr_val)
struct pkg_device *pkgdev;
unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_temp_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&pkg_temp_lock, flags);
++pkg_interrupt_cnt;
disable_pkg_thres_interrupt();
@@ -347,7 +347,7 @@ static int pkg_thermal_notify(u64 msr_val)
pkg_thermal_schedule_work(pkgdev->cpu, &pkgdev->work);
}
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_temp_lock, flags);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pkg_temp_lock, flags);
return 0;
}
@@ -393,9 +393,9 @@ static int pkg_temp_thermal_device_add(unsigned int cpu)
pkgdev->msr_pkg_therm_high);
cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &pkgdev->cpumask);
- spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
packages[pkgid] = pkgdev;
- spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
return 0;
}
@@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static int pkg_thermal_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
}
/* Protect against work and interrupts */
- spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
/*
* Check whether this cpu was the current target and store the new
@@ -464,9 +464,9 @@ static int pkg_thermal_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
* To cancel the work we need to drop the lock, otherwise
* we might deadlock if the work needs to be flushed.
*/
- spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&pkgdev->work);
- spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
/*
* If this is not the last cpu in the package and the work
* did not run after we dropped the lock above, then we
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@ static int pkg_thermal_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
pkg_thermal_schedule_work(target, &pkgdev->work);
}
- spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
+ raw_spin_unlock_irq(&pkg_temp_lock);
/* Final cleanup if this is the last cpu */
if (lastcpu)
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists