linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters when removing lock chain

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202001180106.8H2uIiid%lkp@intel.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jan 2020 02:14:15 +0800
From:   kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To:     Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/8] locking/lockdep: Decrement irq context counters
 when removing lock chain

Hi Waiman,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on tip/locking/core]
[also build test ERROR on tip/auto-latest linus/master arm-perf/for-next/perf v5.5-rc6 next-20200117]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]

url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Waiman-Long/locking-lockdep-Reuse-zapped-chain_hlocks-entries/20200117-093009
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git 1a365e822372ba24c9da0822bc583894f6f3d821
config: sparc64-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: sparc64-linux-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
reproduce:
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=sparc64 

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>

All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):

   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'inc_chains':
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2304:20: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2304:20: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2306:25: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
     else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'dec_chains':
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2314:20: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                       LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2316:25: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
     else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
                            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c: In function 'task_irq_context':
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3612:9: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ'?
     return LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->hardirq_context +
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            LOCK_USED_IN_HARDIRQ_READ
   kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3613:9: error: 'LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT'?
            LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT * !!task->softirq_context;
            ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT
>> kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3614:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
    }
    ^

vim +2304 kernel/locking/lockdep.c

  2301	
  2302	static void inc_chains(int irq_context)
  2303	{
> 2304		if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_HARDIRQ_CONTEXT)
  2305			nr_hardirq_chains++;
> 2306		else if (irq_context & LOCK_CHAIN_SOFTIRQ_CONTEXT)
  2307			nr_softirq_chains++;
  2308		else
  2309			nr_process_chains++;
  2310	}
  2311	

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                 Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation

Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (59412 bytes)