[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <202001182239.IJMl4SVW%lkp@intel.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2020 22:11:56 +0800
From: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: James Clark <james.clark@....com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
nd@....com, James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Tan Xiaojun <tanxiaojun@...wei.com>,
Al Grant <al.grant@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Return EINVAL when precise_ip perf events are
requested on Arm
Hi James,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on arm-soc/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on tip/perf/core linux/master linus/master v5.5-rc6 next-20200117]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/James-Clark/Return-EINVAL-when-precise_ip-perf-events-are-requested-on-Arm/20200116-195500
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm/arm-soc.git for-next
config: arm-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc (GCC) 7.5.0
reproduce:
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
GCC_VERSION=7.5.0 make.cross ARCH=arm
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
drivers//perf/arm_pmu.c: In function 'armpmu_map_event':
>> drivers//perf/arm_pmu.c:105:18: error: 'struct perf_event_attr' has no member named 'precise'; did you mean 'precise_ip'?
if (event->attr.precise)
^~~~~~~
precise_ip
vim +105 drivers//perf/arm_pmu.c
92
93 int
94 armpmu_map_event(struct perf_event *event,
95 const unsigned (*event_map)[PERF_COUNT_HW_MAX],
96 const unsigned (*cache_map)
97 [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_MAX]
98 [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_OP_MAX]
99 [PERF_COUNT_HW_CACHE_RESULT_MAX],
100 u32 raw_event_mask)
101 {
102 u64 config = event->attr.config;
103 int type = event->attr.type;
104
> 105 if (event->attr.precise)
106 return -EINVAL;
107
108 if (type == event->pmu->type)
109 return armpmu_map_raw_event(raw_event_mask, config);
110
111 switch (type) {
112 case PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE:
113 return armpmu_map_hw_event(event_map, config);
114 case PERF_TYPE_HW_CACHE:
115 return armpmu_map_cache_event(cache_map, config);
116 case PERF_TYPE_RAW:
117 return armpmu_map_raw_event(raw_event_mask, config);
118 }
119
120 return -ENOENT;
121 }
122
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org Intel Corporation
Download attachment ".config.gz" of type "application/gzip" (72712 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists