linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: optimise sqe-to-req flags translation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 18 Jan 2020 13:45:12 -0700
From:   Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:     Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] io_uring: optimise sqe-to-req flags translation

On 1/18/20 10:10 AM, Pavel Begunkov wrote:
> On 18/01/2020 19:34, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> +enum {
>>> +	/* correspond one-to-one to IOSQE_IO_* flags*/
>>> +	REQ_F_FIXED_FILE	= BIT(REQ_F_FIXED_FILE_BIT),	/* ctx owns file */
>>
>> I'd put the comment on top of the line instead, these lines are way too
>> long.
> 
> I find it less readable, but let's see

Well, the monster lines are unreadable on an 80-char display... I'm generally
not a stickler with 80 chars, if a few over needs we don't need to break,
I'm all for it. But the long comments are unreadable for me.

-- 
Jens Axboe