lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68d332f9-290d-3537-1691-bb4805573f3f@linux.alibaba.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jan 2020 21:47:22 -0800
From:   Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     mhocko@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: move_pages: fix the return value if there are
 not-migrated pages



On 1/18/20 6:57 PM, Wei Yang wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2020 at 10:37:20AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2020 at 01:26:43PM +0800, Yang Shi wrote:
>>> The do_move_pages_to_node() might return > 0 value, the number of pages
>>> that are not migrated, then the value will be returned to userspace
>>> directly.  But, move_pages() syscall would just return 0 or errno.  So,
>>> we need reset the return value to 0 for such case as what pre-v4.17 did.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a49bd4d71637 ("mm, numa: rework do_pages_move")
>>> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
>>> Cc: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@...ux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org>    [4.17+]
>>> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com>
>>> ---
>>> mm/migrate.c | 5 ++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/migrate.c b/mm/migrate.c
>>> index 86873b6..3e75432 100644
>>> --- a/mm/migrate.c
>>> +++ b/mm/migrate.c
>>> @@ -1659,8 +1659,11 @@ static int do_pages_move(struct mm_struct *mm, nodemask_t task_nodes,
>>> 			goto out_flush;
>>>
>>> 		err = do_move_pages_to_node(mm, &pagelist, current_node);
>>> -		if (err)
>>> +		if (err) {
>>> +			if (err > 0)
>>> +				err = 0;
>>> 			goto out;
>>> +		}
>>> 		if (i > start) {
>>> 			err = store_status(status, start, current_node, i - start);
>>> 			if (err)
>>> -- 
>>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> Hey, I am afraid you missed something. There are three calls of
>> do_move_pages_to_node() in do_pages_move(). Why you just handle one return
>> value? How about the other two?
>>
> Well, current logic in do_pages_move() is a little complicated to read.
>
> I did a cleanup to make it easy to read and also friendly to do this fix.
>
> If they look good to you, you could rebase your fix on top of them.

Regression fix typically has higher priority. Since we already spotted 
the regressions and proposed fixes, I'd suggest we fix them in 5.5-rc, 
then aim any cleanup for 5.6 or 5.7. This should also make review easier 
IMHO.

>
>> -- 
>> Wei Yang
>> Help you, Help me

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ