[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BN7PR08MB568498ED5D86FAA8098EE1C9DB330@BN7PR08MB5684.namprd08.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 21:59:55 +0000
From: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@...ron.com>
To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...il.com>, Bean Huo <huobean@...il.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@...el.com>,
Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3 0/8] Use UFS device indicated maximum LU
number
Hi, Alim
>
> Hi Bean
>
> Your patches based on which tree? At least on Jame's for-next, it give
> compilation errors.
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git)
> Looks like patch-2 introduces below error:
My patches are based on the Martin's tree 5.6/scsi-queue. I tested my patches on James' tree.
Didn't find the compilation error as you mentioned. You can check your source code if it is pretty new,
The last UFS driver updated commit id should be :
commit ea92c32bd336efba89c5b09cf609e6e26e963796
Author: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>
Date: Sat Jan 11 15:11:47 2020 +0800
scsi: ufs-mediatek: add apply_dev_quirks variant operation
Add vendor-specific variant callback "apply_dev_quirks" to MediaTek UFS driver.
Thanks,
//Bean
Powered by blists - more mailing lists