lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2020 09:59:01 +0800 From: Brad Campbell <lists2009@...rfbargle.com> To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/4] hwmon: k10temp driver improvements On 19/1/20 1:14 am, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 1/18/20 12:52 AM, Brad Campbell wrote: >> On 16/1/20 10:17 pm, Guenter Roeck wrote: >>> This patch series implements various improvements for the k10temp >>> driver. >>> >> >> Looks good here. Identical motherboards (ASUS x370 Prime-Pro), >> different CPUs. >> >> 3950x >> > Interesting. I thought the 3950X needs a newer motherboard. This board has the 3950x listed on the compatibility matrix, so I took the punt. I am running a beta BIOS with the 1.0.0.4 AGESA but it's running in a stock production environment and has been stable. I don't overclock or game, it's predominantly a VM host. > Is that CPU as amazing as everyone says it is ? It is fairly impressive and a significant update over the 1800x it replaced. Kernel compiles are pretty quick :) > And does it really need liquid cooling ? No. I'm using a stock AMD Wraith Prism cooler in a 4U rack case. It might reach higher boost clocks with better cooling, but under an all-core load I still see > 4.1GHz across all cores. Regards, Brad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists