[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200120092525.GB608405@krava>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 10:25:25 +0100
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
To: kajoljain <kjain@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>, acme@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Anju T Sudhakar <anju@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Ravi Bangoria <ravi.bangoria@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tools/perf/metricgroup: Fix printing event names of
metric group with multiple events incase of overlapping events
On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 10:23:56AM +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 02:23:19PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> >
> > On 1/8/20 9:32 PM, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 02:41:35PM +0530, kajoljain wrote:
> > >
> > > SNIP
> > >
> > > > > > - int i = 0;
> > > > > > + int i = 0, j = 0;
> > > > > > bool leader_found;
> > > > > > evlist__for_each_entry (perf_evlist, ev) {
> > > > > > + j++;
> > > > > > + if (j <= iterator_perf_evlist)
> > > > > > + continue;
> > > > > > if (!strcmp(ev->name, ids[i])) {
> > > > > > if (!metric_events[i])
> > > > > > metric_events[i] = ev;
> > > > > > @@ -146,6 +151,7 @@ static struct evsel *find_evsel_group(struct
> > > > > > evlist *perf_evlist,
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > }
> > > > > > + iterator_perf_evlist = j;
> > > > > > return metric_events[0];
> > > > > > }
> > > > > >
> > > > > Thanks for reporting and fixing this issue.
> > > > >
> > > > > I just have one question, do we really need a *static variable* to track
> > > > > the matched events? Perhaps using an input parameter?
> > > > Hi Jin,
> > > >
> > > > The other way I come up with to solve this issue is, making change in
> > > > perf_evlist itself by adding some flag in event name, to keep track of
> > > > matched events.
> > > >
> > > > As if we change event name itself, next time when we compare it won't
> > > > matched. But in that case we need to remove those flag later. Which will
> > > > increase the
> > > >
> > > > complexity. If you have any suggestions, please let me know.
> > > we already keep evsel::cpu_iter for similar concept
> > >
> > > so I guess we could have some iterator_perf_evlist variable in evlist..
> > > that is if we don't find other solution (other than static varable)
> >
> > Hi Jiri,
> >
> > Thanks for reviewing the patch. I checked 'evsel::cpu_iter'
> > variable, I think it added recently and I am not able to find any similar
> > kind of variable in
> >
> > evlist. Please let me know if my understanding is fine. Do you want
> > me to add new variable in evlist itself or there is any other way possible.
ah sry, it's in 'struct evsel' ;-)
jirka
>
> please check Arnaldo's tree:
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/acme/linux.git perf/core
>
> jirka
Powered by blists - more mailing lists