[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200120100523.45656-1-wenyang@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 18:05:23 +0800
From: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] timekeeping: improve arithmetic division in scale64_check_overflow()
do_div() does a 64-by-32 division. Use div64_u64() instead of it
if the divisor is u64, to avoid truncation to 32-bit.
And as a nice side effect also cleans up the function a bit.
Signed-off-by: Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
---
kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index ca69290bee2a..4fc2af4367a7 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -1005,9 +1005,8 @@ static int scale64_check_overflow(u64 mult, u64 div, u64 *base)
((int)sizeof(u64)*8 - fls64(mult) < fls64(rem)))
return -EOVERFLOW;
tmp *= mult;
- rem *= mult;
- do_div(rem, div);
+ rem = div64_u64(rem * mult, div);
*base = tmp + rem;
return 0;
}
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists