lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200120125059.GF15507@dell>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 12:50:59 +0000
From:   Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:     Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        Zha Qipeng <qipeng.zha@...el.com>,
        "David E . Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 35/36] platform/x86: intel_pmc_ipc: Convert to MFD

On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 11:14:50AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2020 at 08:12:46AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > Well, by "library" I mean that the SCU IPC itself does not bind to
> > > > > anything but instead it gets called by different drivers such as this
> > > > > one passing the device pointer that is the SCU IPC device. Here for
> > > > > example it is the platfrom device created from an ACPI description.
> > > > 
> > > > Not keen on that at all.  Why can it not be a platform device?
> > > 
> > > We also call the same library from a PCI driver (intel_scu_pcidrv.c in
> > > this series) where the device is of type struct pci_dev.
> > 
> > Not sure I understand the issue.
> 
> You are asking why it cannot be a platform device. It cannot be because
> we are calling the same library from a PCI driver where there is no
> platform device available (only struct pci_dev).

I'm asking why it needs to be called at all.  Why can't it be probed
using the Device Driver API, like most other drivers?

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ