linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc function syntax

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200120154444.7c1d3863@endymion>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 15:44:44 +0100
From:   Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>
To:     Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] docs: i2c: smbus-protocol: enable kernel-doc
 function syntax

On Sun,  5 Jan 2020 23:50:01 +0100, Luca Ceresoli wrote:
> Hyperlinks from function names are not generated in headings. Move them in
> the plain text so they are rendered as clickable hyerlinks.

typo: hyperlinks

> 
> While there also remove an unneeded colon in a heading.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>
> ---
>  Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst | 64 ++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
> index 10c4a989982c..997945e90419 100644
> --- a/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/i2c/smbus-protocol.rst
> @@ -62,8 +62,10 @@ This sends a single bit to the device, at the place of the Rd/Wr bit::
>  Functionality flag: I2C_FUNC_SMBUS_QUICK
>  
>  
> -SMBus Receive Byte:  i2c_smbus_read_byte()
> -==========================================
> +SMBus Receive Byte
> +==================
> +
> +Implemented by i2c_smbus_read_byte()

In file i2c-protocol.rst, the wording used is:

This corresponds to i2c_transfer().

For consistency, can we settle for "Implemented by foo()" everywhere?

Reviewed-by: Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.de>

-- 
Jean Delvare
SUSE L3 Support