lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jan 2020 19:12:13 +0000
From:   Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>
To:     "lantianyu1986@...il.com" <lantianyu1986@...il.com>,
        KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        "sashal@...nel.org" <sashal@...nel.org>,
        "david@...hat.com" <david@...hat.com>
CC:     Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
        "linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org" <linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        vkuznets <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
        "eric.devolder@...cle.com" <eric.devolder@...cle.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH V2 3/10] x86/Hyper-V/Balloon: Replace hot-add and
 balloon up works with a common work

From: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2020 5:10 AM
> 
> The mem hot-remove operation and balloon down will be added
> or moved into work context. Add a common work to handle
> opeations of mem hot-add/remove and balloon up/down.

Let me suggest some improved wording for this commit message:

The Hyper-V balloon driver currently has separate work contexts for memory
hot-add operations and for balloon up (i.e., remove memory from the guest)
operations.  Hot-remove is being added and must be done in a work context.
And finally, balloon down is currently not done in a work context, but needs
to move to a work context because of a Hyper-V bug that confuses balloon
operations and hot-remove.  Rather than add code for two additional work
contexts, consolidate the current hot-add and balloon up operations onto
a single work context.  Subsequent patches will add hot-remove and
balloon down to that same work context.

My assumption is that the consolidation into a single work context is
just code simplification.  If there's another reason, please describe it.

The code is this patch looks OK to me.

Michael

> 
> Signed-off-by: Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>
> ---
>  drivers/hv/hv_balloon.c | 86 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
>  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ