[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200120192432.GJ1511@yoga>
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2020 11:24:32 -0800
From: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
Cc: evgreen@...omium.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de, ohad@...ery.com,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, agross@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] remoteproc: qcom: q6v5-mss: Use
regmap_read_poll_timeout
On Fri 17 Jan 05:51 PST 2020, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> Replace the loop for HALT_ACK detection with regmap_read_poll_timeout.
>
Nice, but we should be able to do the same in q6v5proc_halt_axi_port()?
> Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c | 16 ++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> index 51f451311f5fc..f20b39c6ff0ed 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_mss.c
> @@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
> #define NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT BIT(2)
>
> #define HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS 100
> +#define NAV_HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_US 200
>
> /* QDSP6SS_RESET */
> #define Q6SS_STOP_CORE BIT(0)
> @@ -746,7 +747,6 @@ static void q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(struct q6v5 *qproc,
> struct regmap *halt_map,
> u32 offset)
> {
> - unsigned long timeout;
> unsigned int val;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -760,15 +760,11 @@ static void q6v5proc_halt_nav_axi_port(struct q6v5 *qproc,
> NAV_AXI_HALTREQ_BIT);
>
> /* Wait for halt ack*/
> - timeout = jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_MS);
> - for (;;) {
> - ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
> - if (ret || (val & NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT) ||
> - time_after(jiffies, timeout))
> - break;
> -
> - udelay(5);
> - }
> + ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(halt_map, offset, val,
> + (val & NAV_AXI_HALTACK_BIT),
> + 5, NAV_HALT_ACK_TIMEOUT_US);
> + if (ret)
> + dev_err(qproc->dev, "nav halt ack timeout\n");
Is there a case where this new print adds value beyond the printout we
already have for the case of IDLE_BIT not going high? Can we simply
ignore the return value and skip the print?
Regards,
Bjorn
>
> ret = regmap_read(halt_map, offset, &val);
> if (ret || !(val & NAV_AXI_IDLE_BIT))
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists