linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] x86/mm/pat: silence a data race in cpa_4k

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <E9162CDC-BBC5-4D69-87FB-C93AB8B3D581@lca.pw>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 15:21:35 -0500
From:   Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] x86/mm/pat: silence a data race in cpa_4k_install



> On Jan 21, 2020, at 10:45 AM, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 04:36:49PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
>> Isn't the intent "x86/mm/pat: Mark intentional data race" ?  The fact
>> that KCSAN no longer shows the warning is a side-effect.  At least
>> that's how I see it.
> 
> Perhaps because you've been dealing with KCSAN for so long. :-)
> 
> The main angle here, IMO, is that this "fix" is being done solely for
> KCSAN. Or is there another reason to "fix" intentional data races? At
> least I don't see one. And the text says
> 
> "This will generate a lot of noise on a debug kernel with
> debug_pagealloc with KCSAN enabled which could render the system
> unusable."
> 
> So yes, I think it should say something about making KCSAN happy.
> 
> Oh, and while at it I'd prefer it if it did the __no_kcsan function
> annotation instead of the data_race() thing.

Actually "__no_kcsan" does not work because I have
CONFIG_OPTIMIZE_INLINING=y (GCC 8.3.1) here, so it has to be,

diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
index 20823392f4f2..fabbf8a33b7f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/set_memory.c
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ static inline void cpa_inc_2m_checked(void)
        cpa_2m_checked++;
 }
 
-static inline void cpa_inc_4k_install(void)
+static inline void __no_kcsan_or_inline cpa_inc_4k_install(void)
 {
        cpa_4k_install++;
 }

Are you fine with it or data_race() looks better?