[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200121130444.0f5c39dc1ca6ba393084b14b@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:04:44 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>,
"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/rbtree: avoid pointless rb_node alignment
On Mon, 20 Jan 2020 09:51:44 -0800 Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jan 2020, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
> >timerqueue_del() uses rbtree, and
> >
> > #define rb_parent(r) ((struct rb_node *)((r)->__rb_parent_color & ~3))
> >
> >relies on all objects being 4-byte aligned. But your patch broke that
> >assumption on m68k, where the default alignment is 2-byte.
> >
> >Andrew: please drop this patch.
>
> Yeah that's too bad. I'll send a patch improving the comment around the alignment
> once the patch is dropped.
Thanks, I'll drop this patch.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists