linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-psil: Fix warnings with C=1 and W=1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200121074227.GC2841@vkoul-mobl>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 13:12:27 +0530
From:   Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To:     Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>
Cc:     dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        dan.j.williams@...el.com, grygorii.strashko@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: ti: k3-psil: Fix warnings with C=1 and W=1

On 21-01-20, 09:01, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Fixes the following warnings:
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-j721e.c:62:16: warning: symbol 'j721e_src_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-j721e.c:172:16: warning: symbol 'j721e_dst_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-j721e.c:216:20: warning: symbol 'j721e_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
>   CC      drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-j721e.o
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-am654.c:52:16: warning: symbol 'am654_src_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-am654.c:127:16: warning: symbol 'am654_dst_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?
> drivers/dma/ti/k3-psil-am654.c:169:20: warning: symbol 'am654_ep_map' was not declared. Should it be static?

We dont use titles like this :(
A title should reflect the changes in the patch, I have updated this to
"dmaengine: ti: k3-psil: make symbols static"

and applied now

-- 
~Vinod