linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: hyperv: Move retarget related struct definitions into tlfs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87blqxf9es.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jan 2020 10:25:47 +0100
From:   Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>
To:     Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:     Michael Kelley <mikelley@...rosoft.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
        "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
        Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
        "maintainer\:X86 ARCHITECTURE \(32-BIT AND 64-BIT\)" <x86@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "open list\:PCI NATIVE HOST BRIDGE AND ENDPOINT DRIVERS" 
        <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pci: hyperv: Move retarget related struct definitions into tlfs

Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com> writes:

> For future support of virtual PCI on non-x86 architecture.
>
> Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng (Microsoft) <boqun.feng@...il.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h  | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h     |  8 ++++++
>  drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c | 38 +++--------------------------
>  3 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> index b9ebc20b2385..debe017ae748 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hyperv-tlfs.h
> @@ -912,4 +912,42 @@ struct hv_tlb_flush_ex {
>  struct hv_partition_assist_pg {
>  	u32 tlb_lock_count;
>  };
> +
> +union hv_msi_entry {
> +	u64 as_uint64;
> +	struct {
> +		u32 address;
> +		u32 data;
> +	} __packed;
> +};

While Hyper-V code is full of this, I was once told that 'Union aliasing
is UB. Avoid it for good.' Maybe we should start getting rid of it
instead of adding more?

> +
> +struct hv_interrupt_entry {
> +	u32 source;			/* 1 for MSI(-X) */
> +	u32 reserved1;
> +	union hv_msi_entry msi_entry;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/*
> + * flags for hv_device_interrupt_target.flags
> + */
> +#define HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_MULTICAST		1
> +#define HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_PROCESSOR_SET	2
> +
> +struct hv_device_interrupt_target {
> +	u32 vector;
> +	u32 flags;
> +	union {
> +		u64 vp_mask;
> +		struct hv_vpset vp_set;
> +	};
> +} __packed;
> +
> +/* HvRetargetDeviceInterrupt hypercall */
> +struct hv_retarget_device_interrupt {
> +	u64 partition_id;
> +	u64 device_id;
> +	struct hv_interrupt_entry int_entry;
> +	u64 reserved2;
> +	struct hv_device_interrupt_target int_target;
> +} __packed __aligned(8);
>  #endif
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> index 6b79515abb82..d13319d82f6b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mshyperv.h
> @@ -240,6 +240,14 @@ bool hv_vcpu_is_preempted(int vcpu);
>  static inline void hv_apic_init(void) {}
>  #endif
>  
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV)
> +#define hv_set_msi_address_from_desc(msi_entry, msi_desc)	\
> +do {								\
> +	(msi_entry)->address = (msi_desc)->msg.address_lo;	\
> +} while (0)
> +
> +#endif /* CONFIG_PCI_HYPERV */

It seems to be pointless to put defines under #if IS_ENABLED(): in case
it is not enabled and used you'll get a compilation error, in case it is
enabled and not used no code is going to be generated anyways.

> +
>  #else /* CONFIG_HYPERV */
>  static inline void hyperv_init(void) {}
>  static inline void hyperv_setup_mmu_ops(void) {}
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> index aacfcc90d929..2240f2b3643e 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-hyperv.c
> @@ -406,36 +406,6 @@ struct pci_eject_response {
>  
>  static int pci_ring_size = (4 * PAGE_SIZE);
>  
> -struct hv_interrupt_entry {
> -	u32	source;			/* 1 for MSI(-X) */
> -	u32	reserved1;
> -	u32	address;
> -	u32	data;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * flags for hv_device_interrupt_target.flags
> - */
> -#define HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_MULTICAST		1
> -#define HV_DEVICE_INTERRUPT_TARGET_PROCESSOR_SET	2
> -
> -struct hv_device_interrupt_target {
> -	u32	vector;
> -	u32	flags;
> -	union {
> -		u64		 vp_mask;
> -		struct hv_vpset vp_set;
> -	};
> -};
> -
> -struct retarget_msi_interrupt {
> -	u64	partition_id;		/* use "self" */
> -	u64	device_id;
> -	struct hv_interrupt_entry int_entry;
> -	u64	reserved2;
> -	struct hv_device_interrupt_target int_target;
> -} __packed __aligned(8);
> -
>  /*
>   * Driver specific state.
>   */
> @@ -482,7 +452,7 @@ struct hv_pcibus_device {
>  	struct workqueue_struct *wq;
>  
>  	/* hypercall arg, must not cross page boundary */
> -	struct retarget_msi_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
> +	struct hv_retarget_device_interrupt retarget_msi_interrupt_params;
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * Don't put anything here: retarget_msi_interrupt_params must be last
> @@ -1178,7 +1148,7 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>  {
>  	struct msi_desc *msi_desc = irq_data_get_msi_desc(data);
>  	struct irq_cfg *cfg = irqd_cfg(data);
> -	struct retarget_msi_interrupt *params;
> +	struct hv_retarget_device_interrupt *params;
>  	struct hv_pcibus_device *hbus;
>  	struct cpumask *dest;
>  	cpumask_var_t tmp;
> @@ -1200,8 +1170,8 @@ static void hv_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *data)
>  	memset(params, 0, sizeof(*params));
>  	params->partition_id = HV_PARTITION_ID_SELF;
>  	params->int_entry.source = 1; /* MSI(-X) */
> -	params->int_entry.address = msi_desc->msg.address_lo;
> -	params->int_entry.data = msi_desc->msg.data;
> +	hv_set_msi_address_from_desc(&params->int_entry.msi_entry, msi_desc);

I don't quite see why this hv_set_msi_address_from_desc() is needed at
all.

> +	params->int_entry.msi_entry.data = msi_desc->msg.data;
>  	params->device_id = (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[5] << 24) |
>  			   (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[4] << 16) |
>  			   (hbus->hdev->dev_instance.b[7] << 8) |

-- 
Vitaly